My last post argues in favour of the potential benefits from traffic policing, but that – unlike the apparent bias underlying Operation Safeway – it needs to be done differently. The key point is to prioritise law and rule breaking done by those with greater potential to endanger other road users. Otherwise the bias, which is not so much against law breaking cyclists as in favour of law and rule breaking motorists, will continue. So here are some ideas: Continue reading
Monthly Archives: November 2013
Is there a police blitz on unsafe driving in London?
Harry Venning of the Guardian’s take on the “blitz” in “Clare in the Community”
After a spate of cyclist deaths in London, cyclist safety is on the national agenda. For some, getting cyclist safety in the public eye is inherently good – we’re not so sure. The key issue is, after all, to do the right things for the safety of cyclists. Last week we were told that there is a “new zero-tolerance approach” with a “huge escalation” in policing involving “stopping lorries and cars and where there is unsafe driving they will be taken off the road.”
But is a blitz on unsafe driving – under what is called “Operation Safeway” in London – actually happening? We don’t think so. So what exactly is going on? Continue reading
Do bicycle lights make any difference to cyclist safety?
After a week where cyclist safety in London has hit the headlines, it might seem strange to look at this issue. I was pleased to represent the RDRF at the Bow roundabout protest organised by the London Cycling Campaign addressing issues about danger to cyclists and pedestrians there.
Spot the RDRF Chair at Bow roundabout protest (Photo London Cycling Campaign)
But actually the comments by the Commissioner of Transport for London on this subject – bike lights, that is – tell us a lot about the way “road safety” is thought of. Here are his comments: Continue reading
“CROSS HERE FOR A & E” : Victim blaming of pedestrians?
Consider the front of this leaflet from the Department for Transport and Transport for London:
Below I discuss whether this approach is justified in a society which genuinely wanted a civilised approach to the safety of pedestrians and others. Continue reading
If we want safer roads for cycling we have to change how we measure road safety
Below is the text of this article which appears in the current issue of Local Transport Today Issue 635 15 Nov 2013. Subscribers to the electronic version can also read it here Continue reading
Hi-viz for cyclists and pedestrians: the evidence and context
UPDATE: 24/04/2014- the scan below should now be readable! Below I post a scan of Chapter 9 from “Death on the Streets: cars and the mythology of road safety“. Since the subject of cyclist and pedestrian conspicuity has raised such interest, I took another look at the evidence for conspicuity aids such as h-viz clothing, and the context in which the advocacy of such items occurs. In the twenty years since publication, I am not aware of any fresh evidence which contradicts the conclusions to this Chapter, or the Precaution which I suggest is taken when considering advocacy of hi-viz. Continue reading
Hi-Viz for cyclists and pedestrians: and the case of the motorists who can’t see where they’re going
The Traffic Master jersey for cyclists – the way to “master traffic”?
Our last post has generated more visits than any other. I refer to some comments received and a couple of news items below: Continue reading